Centers for Medicaid and Medicare New regulations Februrary 26, 2026

A temporary ban has been placed on the enrollment of DME providers as of February 26, 2026.

WASHINGTON – The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will implement a six-month nationwide moratorium on the Medicare enrollment of DMEPOS supplier medical supply companies, according to a notice in the Federal Register.

What suppliers are impacted?

The moratorium will affect the following supplier types:

  • Medical supply company

  • Medical supply company with orthotics personnel

  • Medical supply company with pedorthic personnel

  • Medical supply company with prosthetics personnel

  • Medical supply company with prosthetic and orthotic personnel

  • Medical supply company with registered pharmacist

  • Medical supply company with respiratory therapist

What’s behind CMS’s decision?

In a press release, CMS says the moratorium will allow it to explore additional safeguards to further mitigate what it calls longstanding instances of fraud, waste and abuse perpetrated by certain DMEPOS companies. It applies to all applications for initial enrollment and changes in majority ownership for medical supply companies.

In the notice, the agency provided the following:

  • The seven types of medical supply companies listed were all in the top 20 out of over 80 DMEPOS supplier specialty types when looking at the highest percentage of DMEPOS suppliers of a specific specialty type that were revoked at least once since 2023.

  • Five of the seven types of medical supply companies were in the top 10 when reviewing the highest percentage of DMEPOS suppliers with a payment suspension since 2023.

  • Six of the seven types of medical supply companies were in the top 10 when examining the highest percentages of law enforcement referrals since 2023.

  • All seven types were in the top 15 when looking at the highest percentage of BIU complaints for each DMEPOS supplier type since 2023.

Additional measures

The agency also plans to publish information on suppliers whose participation in the Medicare program has been revoked, including their National Provider Identifier (NPI) and the reason for the revocation. This additional transparency, it says, will allow patients and payers, including private insurers, to understand which providers have been subject to such administrative enforcement action by the government.

Will Medicaid follow suit?

CMS says it is allowing each state to decide whether some form of a DME moratorium is appropriate for their respective Medicaid and CHIP programs.

“Each state has greater expertise and experience with their pool of DME provider types, including the requirements for each type of DME provider, than CMS,” it states. “Nevertheless, CMS encourages each state to, as appropriate, implement a DME provider moratorium tailored to the specifics of their beneficiary population as well as any geographic considerations. Additionally, CMS is offering every state and territory the opportunity to consult with CMS on the prospect of implementing a Medicaid- or CHIP-based (or both) DME moratorium in their jurisdictions.”

Latest effort to crack down on health care fraud, CMS says

The agency says these new efforts build on the agency stopping more than $1.5 billion in suspected fraudulent billing in this area this year. It also highlighted recent efforts to address what it says are abusive pricing practices for skin substitutes, which helped to lower premiums by $11 per month for Medicare beneficiaries by reducing overall Part B spending.

The six-month moratorium is part of a larger announcement by the Trump administration on its latest major crackdown on health care fraud, it says.” (https://www.hmenews.com/article/cms-announces-temporary-moratorium-on-new-medicare-enrollment-for-certain-dmepos-suppliers)

There’s been a lot of confusion online lately, so let’s clear things up. Yes, people who already use insulin pumps can still get their pump supplies. Most established DME (Durable Medical Equipment) providers are operating as usual. If you’ve already got a go-to supplier, you’re probably in the clear—expect business as usual.

If you’re new to using a pump, as long as your prescription goes through an existing provider, you should be fine, too.

The real change is this: the new rules are meant to keep new DME suppliers from entering the market, and to prevent existing DME companies from merging. In plain English, if your current supplier is barely hanging on, don’t expect a rescue or a buyout anytime soon. The days of struggling providers being saved by a “white knight” are over. Owners can’t just offload their assets and start fresh with a new company, either. This is a pretty big shift from how things used to work.

But there’s something even bigger on the horizon. Medicare and Medicaid have announced they’ll stop buying pumps outright. Instead, all new pump technology will be available only through monthly leases. No more five-year commitments; instead, recipients might have to pay rent on their pump indefinitely, but they’ll be able to switch to a new device whenever they want. It’s a radical change, and no one really knows yet whether it’ll end up costing more or less. What’s certain is that Medicare’s pump policy could be completely different from what other insurers do going forward. This usually creates significant coverage gaps for those entering Medicare and those who may have a spouse on an employer plan.

There’s a lot still to figure out—some changes might be good, some could be great, and some, well… we’ll just have to wait and see.

6 Likes

This is worrisome for me that this may be the pebble that comes before a rockslide. I currently rely on 3 different DME companies to supply CGM, Pump and urostomy supplies.

2 Likes

@Rphil2 I appreciate the info, but can’t say I understand all the impact or reasoning sufficiently to comment much. It would be helpful if you and @mohe0001 could cut to the crux or provide practical examples of what you think/know impacts will be ; i.e. long term commitment (likeT:slim) and short term (like Omnipod) and CGM. I get long term pump commitments will change, but not sure I follow the impact…good, bad, just different. Regarding cost: I’ve never known costs to go down; whether covered by insurance or not, costs always seem to rise, whether due to profit for shareholders, cost avoidance to government, complexity of product, or economics of time. I know you and @mohe0001 keep close tabs on this stuff, seem to understand it pretty well; I admit to not grasping a lot of the government, insurance, and medical field language.

2 Likes

Yes, this is a thing. I think I wrote about it last on Tu because they were asking for public comment.

@jbowler submitted public comment to them.

The new rules don’t go into effect for a while. The concern from our professional lobbyists is that the last time they did something like this, everybody lost access to glucometers. They are concerned the government lacks disease-specific knowledge to administer a program like this without it limiting patient choice or access.

@TomH , I didn’t write to them about this because I’m on a private insurance policy. It’s not really my place to comment. I simply tried to drum up feedback from those who were most impacted.

3 Likes

I believe Tandem moved to this model last year. It didn’t help their finances - was pretty rocky during the move, but it’s behind them now….

e

I got a new T;Slim pump Dec/Jan no rent.

1 Like

I got a new one too. I *think* I’m paying rent but am not 100% sure.

1 Like