Wow, if they only cover 0%, that is NOT coverage. They are being very misleading.
I had an expensive surgery last year so I met my deductible early on and that meant I paid 0 for my supplies after the surgery. Unfortunately, going through surgery is not the best way to get diabetes supplies at 0 cost!
The 0% thing sounds like a lawyer found an interpretation they could wiggle thru! 0% seems more like an admission of no coverage (no difference between “not covered” and 0% in its effect/impact). A legal challenge that will would likely take years could resolve it, though it’s a toss up whether a temporary injunction against UHC/others would stop them from reaping the benefits of the interpretation. Hopefully, other insurance CO’s don’t take UHC’s lead…
On the other hand, watch what you ask for regarding DME or pharmacy. Depending on people’s insurance coverage it could be a good thing or a bad thing. That said, I’ve never understood the Medicare “illogic” of pump coverage and insulin coverage…makes no sense to me.
The DME is the controller. The pod is disposable supplies essential for the DME to be useful, so they can be covered under the DME benefit. That’s the same approach as Dexcom used for their CGMs. The controller was the DME, and the transmitters and sensors were the essential disposable supplies. Years later Dexcom was able to negotiate pharmacy benefit coverage with some plans, but that didn’t come first.
Same here on Medicare pharmacy coverage. There is a new OOP annual max of $2,000. I will be hitting that in June, thanks to regular supplies of pods counting against it together with a $500 deductible counting against it, plus insulin. After that I think my copay for pods and insulin will be zero for the rest of the year. Seems crazy…