One stats which works well for aggregate studies but absolutely not for individual recommendation: I think you are spot on the money when you conclude that it is not a worthwhile metric for many individual recommendations.
I was quick on the trigger Sam just said the same thing as I, but did before me!
It is appropriate, and even necessary, to aggregate many different cases into categories so as to be able to make overall qualitative deductions on such categories. Otherwise, how can you generalize?
The issue arises when you use these generalizations to make individual recommendations. it may be qualitatively true that, statistically, BMI, on average, correlates with X and Y. But it all depends upon the SD (standard deviation) of the given correlation. If the SD is wide, then it liekly that many individual recommendations will be off the mark.
Unfortunately, this is just what happens with BMI:
-
BMI is used for individual recommendations. Just look at the number of calculators, and the recipes they give you to draw simple-minded conclusions
-
there is a very wide range of body types, and numerous studies have come out showing that a lot of the advice given does not apply to wide ranges of body shapes with the same BMI.
So, unless a piece of research actually provides you with the actual statistical parameters for the generalized concept you use, drawing any lessons on an individual case is VERY difficult.
As always, @Cardamom, your post brings out something to light I did not know. I love reading your comments and sources.
Agree again. It is very frustrating for people like Harold or me, stocky and muscular, to constantly get poor advice, even sometimes from uninformed medical professionals.
As a note, I sometimes get worried about wording on the forum. When I read everyone’s post here, I feel we are all saying exactly the same thing! But I can also see that some of the same posts can be misunderstood to imply disagreements or worse!