I’m not too crazy about the AI use in summaries of topics. My statements were misrepresented and didn’t capture what I said. I’m not sure about the other people whether they felt what they said was misrepresented. It would make me less likely to introduce a topic. People can read them. They don’t need a summary done by AI.
2 Likes
How did you manage to get an AI to summarise something you wrote? I just tried and it (the one in DuckDuckGo) summarised the wrong thing. It was also incorrect and if you do what it suggested was what you needed to do your program will crash…
1 Like
It’s too bad that the AI doesn’t really work right now.
Initially, I was surprised at how cautious a path companies like Tandem were taking w/r/t the use of AI in insulin delivery. But now that we’ve seen AI in many other things, I think their approach has been prudent.
Some people believe that improved accuracy of AI is just a matter of time. What if inaccuracies were endemic to the program design - so there will always be misrepresentation like @andrea8 points out?
We’d be using AI very differently.
2 Likes
I did not write the AI. I just pushed on the word summarize and it was a whole AI rendition not entirely accurate of my topic and replies. I definitely did not want to use AI someone I think fudiabetes did it. I object to that and didn’t expect it. I just didn’t know what summarize meant or maybe when I push summarize that’s what Ai did.
Good thing you aren’t thawing your Thanksgiving turkey!
We use AI to summarize our meetings at work but you still always have to review and tweak the summarizations before passing that info on, because as you’ve found out, it’s great at laying things nice and neat, but it doesn’t always summarize to the spirit of the letter. ChatGPT summarizations give that disclaimer also anytime you copy summaries.
1 Like