# \#horsecrap

**URL:** https://forum.fudiabetes.org/tag/horsecrap/289.md

[Latest](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/latest.md) · [Categories](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/categories.md) · [Tags](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/tags.md)

---

## [Another "Research" Gem From--Reader's Digest](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/t/another-research-gem-from-readers-digest/1902)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@docslotnick](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/u/docslotnick)\
**Replies:** 29\
**Last updated:** [September 13, 2017, 3:11pm UTC](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/t/another-research-gem-from-readers-digest/1902 "2017-09-13T15:11:10Z")

</div>

More groundbreaking diabetes news from that paragon publication of science. Does anyone else sense a pattern?

---

## ["Pasta doesn't raise blood sugars" writes Reader's Digest](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/t/pasta-doesnt-raise-blood-sugars-writes-readers-digest/1682)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Michel](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/u/Michel)\
**Replies:** 24\
**Last updated:** [September 2, 2017, 2:32am UTC](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/t/pasta-doesnt-raise-blood-sugars-writes-readers-digest/1682 "2017-09-02T02:32:20Z")

</div>

As if we needed more proof that it is critical to carefully vet the sources we use for what we read… This quote, at least, is definite proof that the Reader’s Digest does not make the grade. Have a look at this: "Pasta …