# ADA Issues Time-in-Range Targets for CGM Use

**URL:** <https://forum.fudiabetes.org/t/ada-issues-time-in-range-targets-for-cgm-use/7701>\
**Category:** D-News\
**Tags:** cgm\
**Created:** [June 14, 2019, 5:00pm UTC](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/t/ada-issues-time-in-range-targets-for-cgm-use/7701 "2019-06-14T17:00:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Katers87](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/a9adbd/32.png) [@Katers87](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/u/Katers87)\
**Post date:** [June 14, 2019, 8:12pm UTC](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/t/ada-issues-time-in-range-targets-for-cgm-use/7701/2 "2019-06-14T20:12:20Z")

</div>

Thanks for posting!

Page 4 of the report provides the following table of targets. Unfortunately I can only paste it in as a picture because the formatting gets all screwed up when I try to paste it in any other way. Hopefully those of you who are unable to read the picture can reference the link directly to view the table.

 ![image](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/uploads/fudiabetes/original/2X/0/0dd37b9adad3f752d0b79782bfd583f800c7c66b.png)

I’ve often wondered what the ideal % of time in range would be. I’ve never seen recommendations like this published anywhere.

The claim of benefits for every 5% increase is interesting. I might look into the references to see what benefits have been measured.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.fudiabetes.org/t/ada-issues-time-in-range-targets-for-cgm-use/7701)._